Student Feedback (True data from IIT-KGP ERP System)

 

Response For MA61002, SWITCHING AND AUTOMATA THEORY, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2011-2012, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: SOURAV MUKHOPADHYAY

5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

I .1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area

4.25

4.0

Bar

I .2

Clarification of the objectives of the course

4.50

4.5

Bar

I .3

Stimulation of interest in the subject area

4.50

4.5

Bar

I .4

Promotion of analytical/logical thinking

4.50

5.0

Bar

I .5

Clarity of presentation

4.75

5.0

Bar

I .6

Inclusion of recent developments with real life examples

4.25

4.5

Bar

I .7

Encouraging questions in class

4.50

4.5

Bar

I .8

Challenging tests

4.25

4.0

Bar

I .9

Quality of evaluation

4.75

5.0

Bar

I .10

Prompt and detailed feedback

4.75

5.0

Bar

I .11

Help in the course work available outside the class

5.00

5.0

Bar

I .12

Friendly and helpful towards students

5.00

5.0

Bar

I .13

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject

4.75

5.0

Bar

I .14

Participation/academic interaction during class

4.75

5.0

Bar

I .15

Quality of assignments and tutorials

5.00

5.0

Bar

I .16

Number of assignments / tutorials (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

5.00

5.0

Bar

I .17

Pace / speed of teaching (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

5.00

5.0

Bar

II.1

Rating the course structure

3.00

4.0

Bar

II.2

Registered Students academic effort in studying the course

4.60

5.0

Bar

II.3

Overall rating of the teacher

4.80

5.0

Bar

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Response For MA61027, CRYPTOGRAPHY AND NETWORK SECURITY, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2010-2011, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: SOURAV MUKHOPADHYAY
5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

I .1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area

4.88

5.0

Bar

I .2

Clarification of the objectives of the course

4.88

5.0

Bar

I .3

Stimulation of interest in the subject area

5.00

5.0

Bar

I .4

Promotion of analytical/logical thinking

4.88

5.0

Bar

I .5

Clarity of presentation

4.75

5.0

Bar

I .6

Inclusion of recent developments with real life examples

4.88

5.0

Bar

I .7

Encouraging questions in class

4.88

5.0

Bar

I .8

Challenging tests

5.00

5.0

Bar

I .9

Quality of evaluation

4.88

5.0

Bar

I .10

Prompt and detailed feedback

4.75

5.0

Bar

I .11

Help in the course work available outside the class

4.88

5.0

Bar

I .12

Friendly and helpful towards students

5.00

5.0

Bar

I .13

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject

4.88

5.0

Bar

I .14

Participation/academic interaction during class

4.75

5.0

Bar

I .15

Quality of assignments and tutorials

4.88

5.0

Bar

I .16

Number of assignments / tutorials (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

5.00

5.0

Bar

I .17

Pace / speed of teaching (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

4.75

5.0

Bar

II.1

Rating the course structure

4.83

5.0

Bar

II.2

Registered Students academic effort in studying the course

5.00

5.0

Bar

II.3

Overall rating of the teacher

5.00

5.0

Bar

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Response For MA60001, PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES, L-T-P (3-0-0), Credit(3),
Session 2010-2011, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: SOURAV MUKHOPADHYAY
5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

I .1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area

4.26

4.0

Bar

I .2

Clarification of the objectives of the course

3.95

4.0

Bar

I .3

Stimulation of interest in the subject area

4.26

4.0

Bar

I .4

Promotion of analytical/logical thinking

4.37

5.0

Bar

I .5

Clarity of presentation

4.47

4.0

Bar

I .6

Inclusion of recent developments with real life examples

4.47

5.0

Bar

I .7

Encouraging questions in class

4.53

5.0

Bar

I .8

Challenging tests

4.21

4.0

Bar

I .9

Quality of evaluation

4.47

5.0

Bar

I .10

Prompt and detailed feedback

4.21

4.0

Bar

I .11

Help in the course work available outside the class

4.26

4.0

Bar

I .12

Friendly and helpful towards students

4.58

5.0

Bar

I .13

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject

4.47

5.0

Bar

I .14

Participation/academic interaction during class

4.53

5.0

Bar

I .15

Quality of assignments and tutorials

4.53

5.0

Bar

I .16

Number of assignments / tutorials (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

4.59

5.0

Bar

I .17

Pace / speed of teaching (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

4.71

5.0

Bar

II.1

Rating the course structure

4.40

5.0

Bar

II.2

Registered Students academic effort in studying the course

4.27

4.0

Bar

II.3

Overall rating of the teacher

4.33

4.0

Bar

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Response For MA20104, PROBABILITY & STATISTICS, L-T-P (3-0-0), Credit(3),
Session 2010-2011, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: SOURAV MUKHOPADHYAY
5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

I .1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area

4.11

4.0

Bar

I .2

Clarification of the objectives of the course

3.98

4.0

Bar

I .3

Stimulation of interest in the subject area

3.93

4.0

Bar

I .4

Promotion of analytical/logical thinking

4.02

4.0

Bar

I .5

Clarity of presentation

3.95

4.0

Bar

I .6

Inclusion of recent developments with real life examples

3.90

4.0

Bar

I .7

Encouraging questions in class

3.98

4.0

Bar

I .8

Challenging tests

3.95

4.0

Bar

I .9

Quality of evaluation

3.97

4.0

Bar

I .10

Prompt and detailed feedback

3.94

4.0

Bar

I .11

Help in the course work available outside the class

4.01

4.0

Bar

I .12

Friendly and helpful towards students

4.01

4.0

Bar

I .13

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject

3.95

4.0

Bar

I .14

Participation/academic interaction during class

3.98

4.0

Bar

I .15

Quality of assignments and tutorials

4.04

4.0

Bar

I .16

Number of assignments / tutorials (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

4.01

4.0

Bar

I .17

Pace / speed of teaching (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

4.04

4.0

Bar

II.1

Rating the course structure

3.98

4.0

Bar

II.2

Registered Students academic effort in studying the course

3.89

4.0

Bar

II.3

Overall rating of the teacher

4.01

4.0

Bar

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feedback Response For MA20106, PROBABILITY & STOCHASTIC PROCESSES, L-T-P (3-0-0), Credit(3),
Session 2012-2013, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: SOURAV MUKHOPADHYAY
5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding
No. of students who have given feedback -159

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

I .1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area

4.04

4.0

Bar

I .2

Clarification of the objectives of the course

3.91

4.0

Bar

I .3

Stimulation of interest in the subject area

3.95

4.0

Bar

I .4

Promotion of analytical/logical thinking

3.91

4.0

Bar

I .5

Clarity of presentation

3.90

4.0

Bar

I .6

Inclusion of recent developments with real life examples

3.80

4.0

Bar

I .7

Encouraging questions in class

3.94

4.0

Bar

I .8

Challenging tests

3.88

4.0

Bar

I .9

Quality of evaluation

3.90

4.0

Bar

I .10

Prompt and detailed feedback

3.89

4.0

Bar

I .11

Help in the course work available outside the class

3.97

4.0

Bar

I .12

Friendly and helpful towards students

4.18

4.0

Bar

I .13

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject

4.06

4.0

Bar

I .14

Participation/academic interaction during class

4.00

4.0

Bar

I .15

Quality of assignments and tutorials

4.04

4.0

Bar

I .16

Number of assignments / tutorials (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

4.12

4.0

Bar

I .17

Pace / speed of teaching (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

4.11

4.0

Bar

II.1

Rating the course structure

4.05

4.0

Bar

II.2

Registered Students academic effort in studying the course

3.94

4.0

Bar

II.3

Considering all aspects of the teacher what would be your overall rating of the teacher?

4.04

4.0

Bar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Response For MA32006, REGRESSION ANALYSIS, L-T-P (3-0-0), Credit(3),
Session 2009-2010, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: SOURAV MUKHOPADHYAY
5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

I .1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area

4.03

4.0

Bar

I .2

Clarification of the objectives of the course

3.93

4.0

Bar

I .3

Stimulation of interest in the subject area

3.97

4.0

Bar

I .4

Promotion of analytical/logical thinking

3.97

4.0

Bar

I .5

Clarity of presentation

3.90

4.0

Bar

I .6

Inclusion of recent developments with real life examples

3.77

4.0

Bar

I .7

Encouraging questions in class

4.03

4.0

Bar

I .8

Challenging tests

4.07

4.0

Bar

I .9

Quality of evaluation

4.07

4.0

Bar

I .10

Prompt and detailed feedback

3.93

4.0

Bar

I .11

Help in the course work available outside the class

4.07

4.0

Bar

I .12

Friendly and helpful towards students

4.23

4.5

Bar

I .13

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject

4.17

4.0

Bar

I .14

Participation/academic interaction during class

4.07

4.0

Bar

I .15

Quality of assignments and tutorials

3.97

4.0

Bar

I .16

Number of assignments / tutorials (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

3.97

4.0

Bar

I .17

Pace / speed of teaching (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

3.87

4.0

Bar

II.1

Rating the course structure

4.10

4.0

Bar

II.2

Registered Students academic effort in studying the course

4.10

4.0

Bar

II.3

Overall rating of the teacher

4.10

4.0

Bar

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feedback Response For MA31020, REGRESSION AND TIME SERIES MODEL, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2011-2012, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: SOURAV MUKHOPADHYAY
5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

I .1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area

4.00

4.0

Bar

I .2

Clarification of the objectives of the course

4.18

4.0

Bar

I .3

Stimulation of interest in the subject area

4.06

4.0

Bar

I .4

Promotion of analytical/logical thinking

4.00

4.0

Bar

I .5

Clarity of presentation

4.00

4.0

Bar

I .6

Inclusion of recent developments with real life examples

3.88

4.0

Bar

I .7

Encouraging questions in class

4.06

4.0

Bar

I .8

Challenging tests

3.82

4.0

Bar

I .9

Quality of evaluation

4.03

4.0

Bar

I .10

Prompt and detailed feedback

3.97

4.0

Bar

I .11

Help in the course work available outside the class

4.18

4.0

Bar

I .12

Friendly and helpful towards students

4.27

4.0

Bar

I .13

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject

4.27

4.0

Bar

I .14

Participation/academic interaction during class

4.21

4.0

Bar

I .15

Quality of assignments and tutorials

3.94

4.0

Bar

I .16

Number of assignments / tutorials (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

3.88

4.0

Bar

I .17

Pace / speed of teaching (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

3.97

4.0

Bar

II.1

Rating the course structure

4.15

4.0

Bar

II.2

Registered Students academic effort in studying the course

4.03

4.0

Bar

II.3

Considering all aspects of the teacher what would be your overall rating of the teacher?

4.15

4.0

Bar

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feedback Response For MA21007, DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2013-2014, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: SOURAV MUKHOPADHYAY
5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding
No. of students who have given feedback -103

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

I .1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area

3.94

4.0

Bar

I .2

Clarification of the objectives of the course

3.91

4.0

Bar

I .3

Stimulation of interest in the subject area

3.85

4.0

Bar

I .4

Promotion of analytical/logical thinking

3.86

4.0

Bar

I .5

Clarity of presentation

3.78

4.0

Bar

I .6

Inclusion of recent developments with real life examples

3.78

4.0

Bar

I .7

Encouraging questions in class

3.93

4.0

Bar

I .8

Challenging tests

4.01

4.0

Bar

I .9

Quality of evaluation

3.90

4.0

Bar

I .10

Prompt and detailed feedback

3.83

4.0

Bar

I .11

Help in the course work available outside the class

3.93

4.0

Bar

I .12

Friendly and helpful towards students

4.13

4.0

Bar

I .13

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject

3.97

4.0

Bar

I .14

Participation/academic interaction during class

3.99

4.0

Bar

I .15

Quality of assignments and tutorials

4.05

4.0

Bar

I .16

Number of assignments / tutorials (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

3.94

4.0

Bar

I .17

Pace / speed of teaching (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right)

3.83

4.0

Bar

II.1

Rating the course structure

3.98

4.0

Bar

II.2

Registered Students academic effort in studying the course

3.88

4.0

Bar

II.3

Considering all aspects of the teacher what would be your overall rating of the teacher?

4.00

4.0

Bar

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feedback Response For MA21007, DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2017-2018, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: Sourav Mukhopadhyay

No. of students who have given feedback -185
Average (for teacher's assessment) -4.04

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

Teacher's Assesment

I.1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.03

4.0

Bar

I.2

Stimulation of interest in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.01

4.0

Bar

I.3

Clarity of presentation and ease of understanding
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.99

4.0

Bar

I.4

Pace / speed of teaching
[1 = Too Slow, 3 = Slow, 5 = Just Right, 3 = Fast, 1 = Too Fast]

4.55

5.0

Bar

I.5

Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.97

4.0

Bar

I.6

Quality of tests , assignments and tutorials
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.90

4.0

Bar

I.7

Quality of evaluation
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.99

4.0

Bar

I.8

Timely Feedback on student's performance
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.82

4.0

Bar

I.9

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.00

4.0

Bar

I.10

Friendliness and approachability of the teacher
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.19

4.0

Bar

Self Assesment of Students

I.13

Your effort in studying the course
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.21

3.0

Bar

I.14

Workload of this course in comparison with other courses
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.24

3.0

Bar

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feedback Response For MA60002, DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2016-2017, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: Sourav Mukhopadhyay

No. of students who have given feedback -125
Average (for teacher's assessment) -4.20

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

Teacher's Assesment

I.1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.25

4.0

Bar

I.2

Stimulation of interest in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.21

4.0

Bar

I.3

Clarity of presentation and ease of understanding
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.18

4.0

Bar

I.4

Pace / speed of teaching
[1 = Too Slow, 3 = Slow, 5 = Just Right, 3 = Fast, 1 = Too Fast]

4.44

5.0

Bar

I.5

Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.10

4.0

Bar

I.6

Quality of tests , assignments and tutorials
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.14

4.0

Bar

I.7

Quality of evaluation
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.22

4.0

Bar

I.8

Timely Feedback on student's performance
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.09

4.0

Bar

I.9

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.09

4.0

Bar

I.10

Friendliness and approachability of the teacher
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.28

5.0

Bar

Self Assesment of Students

I.13

Your effort in studying the course
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.18

3.0

Bar

I.14

Workload of this course in comparison with other courses
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.13

3.0

Bar

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feedback Response For MA21007, DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2017-2018, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: Sourav Mukhopadhyay

No. of students who have given feedback -185
Average (for teacher's assessment) -4.04

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

Teacher's Assesment

I.1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.03

4.0

Bar

I.2

Stimulation of interest in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.01

4.0

Bar

I.3

Clarity of presentation and ease of understanding
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.99

4.0

Bar

I.4

Pace / speed of teaching
[1 = Too Slow, 3 = Slow, 5 = Just Right, 3 = Fast, 1 = Too Fast]

4.55

5.0

Bar

I.5

Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.97

4.0

Bar

I.6

Quality of tests , assignments and tutorials
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.90

4.0

Bar

I.7

Quality of evaluation
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.99

4.0

Bar

I.8

Timely Feedback on student's performance
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.82

4.0

Bar

I.9

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.00

4.0

Bar

I.10

Friendliness and approachability of the teacher
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.19

4.0

Bar

Self Assesment of Students

I.13

Your effort in studying the course
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.21

3.0

Bar

I.14

Workload of this course in comparison with other courses
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.24

3.0

Bar

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feedback Response For MA61027, CRYPTOGRAPHY AND NETWORK SECURITY, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2017-2018, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: Sourav Mukhopadhyay

No. of students who have given feedback -172
Average (for teacher's assessment) -3.99

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

Teacher's Assesment

I.1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.99

4.0

Bar

I.2

Stimulation of interest in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.92

4.0

Bar

I.3

Clarity of presentation and ease of understanding
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.90

4.0

Bar

I.4

Pace / speed of teaching
[1 = Too Slow, 3 = Slow, 5 = Just Right, 3 = Fast, 1 = Too Fast]

4.62

5.0

Bar

I.5

Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.97

4.0

Bar

I.6

Quality of tests , assignments and tutorials
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.88

4.0

Bar

I.7

Quality of evaluation
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.89

4.0

Bar

I.8

Timely Feedback on student's performance
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.74

4.0

Bar

I.9

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.95

4.0

Bar

I.10

Friendliness and approachability of the teacher
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.07

4.0

Bar

Self Assesment of Students

I.13

Your effort in studying the course
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.05

3.0

Bar

I.14

Workload of this course in comparison with other courses
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.00

3.0

Bar

 

 

Feedback Response For MA60002, DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2017-2018, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: Sourav Mukhopadhyay

No. of students who have given feedback -125
Average (for teacher's assessment) -4.24

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

Teacher's Assesment

I.1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.22

4.0

Bar

I.2

Stimulation of interest in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.22

4.0

Bar

I.3

Clarity of presentation and ease of understanding
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.21

4.0

Bar

I.4

Pace / speed of teaching
[1 = Too Slow, 3 = Slow, 5 = Just Right, 3 = Fast, 1 = Too Fast]

4.65

5.0

Bar

I.5

Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.16

4.0

Bar

I.6

Quality of tests , assignments and tutorials
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.14

4.0

Bar

I.7

Quality of evaluation
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.18

4.0

Bar

I.8

Timely Feedback on student's performance
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.10

4.0

Bar

I.9

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.21

4.0

Bar

I.10

Friendliness and approachability of the teacher
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.30

5.0

Bar

Self Assesment of Students

I.13

Your effort in studying the course
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.17

3.0

Bar

I.14

Workload of this course in comparison with other courses
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.15

3.0

Bar

Feedback Response For MA21007, DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4),
Session 2019-2020, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: Sourav Mukhopadhyay

No. of students who have given feedback -217
Average (for teacher's assessment) -4.19

#

Question Text

Response

 Mean 

 Median 

 Display 

Teacher's Assesment

I.1

Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.29

5.0

Bar

I.2

Stimulation of interest in the subject area
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.25

5.0

Bar

I.3

Clarity of presentation and ease of understanding
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.24

5.0

Bar

I.4

Pace / speed of teaching
[1 = Too Slow, 3 = Slow, 5 = Just Right, 3 = Fast, 1 = Too Fast]

4.18

5.0

Bar

I.5

Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.26

5.0

Bar

I.6

Quality of tests , assignments and tutorials
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.07

4.0

Bar

I.7

Quality of evaluation
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.09

4.0

Bar

I.8

Timely Feedback on student's performance
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

3.99

4.0

Bar

I.9

Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.19

5.0

Bar

I.10

Friendliness and approachability of the teacher
[1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent]

4.33

5.0

Bar

Self Assesment of Students

I.13

Your effort in studying the course
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.15

3.0

Bar

I.14

Workload of this course in comparison with other courses
[1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy]

3.20

3.0

Bar

Home